Ford, Mary (2008) Evans v United Kingdom : what implications for the jurisprudence of pregnancy? Human Rights Law Review, 8 (1). pp. 171-184. ISSN 1461-7781Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)
The recent case of Evans v United Kingdom1 documents a personal tragedy for Natallie Evans and an unenviable moral dilemma for her former partner, Howard Johnston, but for lawyers and academic commentators the decisions of the courts in the case have also presented a rare opportunity to analyse the operation of human rights provisions in the arena of what were once called ‘new reproductive technologies’, and—as will be demonstrated here—to build on this analysis to reappraise wider debates about the rights and relationships surrounding reproduction.
|Keywords:||ethics , medical law, pregnancy, Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine , Sociology and Political Science, Law|
|Subjects:||Medicine > Public aspects of medicine > Forensic Medicine. Medical jurisprudence. Legal medicine|
|Department:||Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Law > Law|
|Depositing user:||Pure Administrator|
|Date Deposited:||13 Sep 2011 11:21|
|Last modified:||22 Mar 2017 11:35|