Norrie, Kenneth (2005) Tales from the court. Journal of the Law Society of Scotland, 50 (10). pp. 20-21. ISSN 0458-8711Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)
Comments on four family law cases heard in the Court of Session: (1) Wetherhill v Sheikh on the doctrine of marriage by cohabitation with habit and repute; (2) Kaur v Singh on the threats which could vitiate consent to a forced marriage and choice of law; (3) B v B on jurisdiction issues in contact disputes; and (4) Sweeney v Sweeney (No.2) on special circumstances which justified a decision not to share matrimonial assets equally.
|Keywords:||litigants behaving badly, marriage by cohabitation with deceitful habit and repute, forced marriage by threat, choice of law in nullity cases, jurisdictional ping-pong, the Sweeney divorce and capital gains tax, choice of law, family law, cohabitation, common law marriage, consent, financial provision, forced marriages, Law (General)|
|Subjects:||Law > Law (General)|
|Department:||Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Law > Law|
|Depositing user:||Pure Administrator|
|Date Deposited:||27 Oct 2011 13:24|
|Last modified:||29 Apr 2016 01:54|