Picture of smart phone in human hand

World leading smartphone and mobile technology research at Strathclyde...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including by Strathclyde researchers from the Department of Computer & Information Sciences involved in researching exciting new applications for mobile and smartphone technology. But the transformative application of mobile technologies is also the focus of research within disciplines as diverse as Electronic & Electrical Engineering, Marketing, Human Resource Management and Biomedical Enginering, among others.

Explore Strathclyde's Open Access research on smartphone technology now...

Contact, welfare and the right to (gay) family life

Norrie, Kenneth (2003) Contact, welfare and the right to (gay) family life. Scots Law Times, 3. pp. 23-27.

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

It sometimes happens that in a single year a series of law reform events, legislative and judicial, transforms the landscape of a particular area of law. In relation to the legal position of lesbians and gay men, 1999 was such a year. The House of Lords in Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association [1999] 4 All ER 705 held that a same-sex couple could be considered a “family” for certain statutory purposes; the European Court of Human Rights accepted for the first time that discrimination on that basis was contrary to art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (Salgueiro da Silva Mouta v Portugal (1999) 31 EHRR 47 (p 1055)), and also that the UK's policy of dismissing gay men and lesbians from the armed forces was contrary to art 8 (Lustig-Prean and Beckett v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 548); and constitutional courts across the (western) world handed down judgments striking down a variety of legislative provisions that treated same-sex couples less favourably than opposite-sex couples.