Picture of virus under microscope

Research under the microscope...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs.

Strathprints serves world leading Open Access research by the University of Strathclyde, including research by the Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences (SIPBS), where research centres such as the Industrial Biotechnology Innovation Centre (IBioIC), the Cancer Research UK Formulation Unit, SeaBioTech and the Centre for Biophotonics are based.

Explore SIPBS research

Under the shadow of defeat : the state and the commemoration of the Franco-Prussian war, 1871-1914

Varley, Karine (2002) Under the shadow of defeat : the state and the commemoration of the Franco-Prussian war, 1871-1914. French History, 16 (3). pp. 323-344.

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

The French defeat in the Franco‐Prussian War represented a crushing blow for the Second Empire, the fledgling Republic and the French nation. While intellectuals and policymakers embarked on a process of soul‐searching, the French public responded to the defeat with an unprecedented wave of commemorative acts predicated on the belief that the French national defence was more honourable and more glorious than the German victory. In recent years, much attention has been devoted to the Third Republic's celebration of the French revolutionary past, and the role these celebrations played in developing and sustaining republican values. In this article, however, I examine the Republic's comparative neglect of its more recent past. The first section outlines the practical considerations and obligations behind the state's work to bury those who died in the Franco‐Prussian War. The second section explores the government's intervention in and influence over certain commemorative acts. In the third section, the article examines sustained government resistance to the creation of a commemorative medal for veterans of the war. I argue that successive governments adopted a relatively passive role in the war commemorations owing to fears that resurrecting memories of the war might serve to undermine the stability and legitimacy of the Republic.