Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Withholding culpable homicide Ferguson v HM Advocate

Mcdiarmid, Claire (2009) Withholding culpable homicide Ferguson v HM Advocate. Edinburgh Law Review, 13 (2). 316 - 320. ISSN 1364-9809

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Ferguson v HM Advocate1 raises the question of withholding the culpable homicide verdict from the jury in a murder trial. It also touches upon the inference to be drawn from the use of a lethal weapon in an attack which is eventually fatal. This comment considers both of these points.

Item type: Article
ID code: 29507
Keywords: culpable homicide, Ferguson v HMA, case law, trial, Law (General)
Subjects: Law > Law (General)
Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Law > Law
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Pure Administrator
    Date Deposited: 21 Mar 2011 16:49
    Last modified: 04 Oct 2012 13:35
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/29507

    Actions (login required)

    View Item