Mcdiarmid, Claire (2009) Withholding culpable homicide Ferguson v HM Advocate. Edinburgh Law Review, 13 (2). 316 - 320. ISSN 1364-9809
Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/E1364980909001395
Abstract
Ferguson v HM Advocate1 raises the question of withholding the culpable homicide verdict from the jury in a murder trial. It also touches upon the inference to be drawn from the use of a lethal weapon in an attack which is eventually fatal. This comment considers both of these points.
| Item type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ID code: | 29507 |
| Keywords: | culpable homicide, Ferguson v HMA, case law, trial, Law (General) |
| Subjects: | Law > Law (General) |
| Department: | Faculty of Humanities And Social Sciences > Law |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing user: | Pure Administrator |
| Date Deposited: | 21 Mar 2011 16:49 |
| Last modified: | 04 Oct 2012 13:35 |
| URI: | http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/29507 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |