Strathprints logo
Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Role of ciliates and other microzooplankton in the Irminger Sea (NW Atlantic Ocean)

Montagnes, D.J.S. and Allen, J. and Brown, L. and Bulit, C. and Davidson, R. and Fielding, S. and Heath, M. and Holliday, N.P. and Rasmussen, J. and Sanders, R. and Waniek, J.J. and Wilson, D. (2011) Role of ciliates and other microzooplankton in the Irminger Sea (NW Atlantic Ocean). Marine Ecology Progress Series, 411. pp. 101-115. ISSN 0171-8630

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

This study focuses on a large region of the open ocean where we predict that microzooplankton significantly influence foodweb structure over much of the year. The Irminger Sea exhibits low primary production that is generally poor for copepod production; in such waters, ciliates and other microzooplankton are major grazers of primary production and contribute significantly to the diets of holo- and mero-mesozooplankton. Surface plankton samples were collected during an extensive survey across the basin and along one transect at several depths, over 3 seasons (winter, spring, summer), but not including the spring bloom. Microzooplankton and phytoplankton samples were fixed with Lugol’s solution and microscopically enumerated for species abundance; biomass was determined from cell volumes. Basin-scale distributions of abundance, biomass, and production were examined by geostatistical and multidimensional scaling methods. Dominance of the <10 µm phytoplankton suggests that this should be a microzooplankton-dominated food web. Ciliates and heterotrophic dinoflagellates are abundant in terms of numbers and biomass; heterotrophic dinoflagellates are more abundant than ciliates, but are less dominant in terms of biomass. Using ciliates as a proxy for all microzooplankton, we suggest that there are seasonal patterns in occurrence, and there is no basin-scale patchiness related to hydrographic features. We suggest that ciliate production is sufficient to account for the removal of 15 to 30% of the <10 µm primary production. If heterotrophic dinoflagellates were included in these estimates, removal may be doubled (i.e. 30 to 60%). We therefore contend that microzooplankton are major phytoplankton consumers in the system and should be carefully parameterised in models of this region.

Item type: Article
ID code: 29140
Notes: Title has been changed and small changes to authors
Keywords: ciliates, biomass, picoplankton , nanoplankton, ciliates , food web, biomass nanoplankton , Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling, Zoology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Aquatic Science
Subjects: Agriculture > Aquaculture. Fisheries. Angling
Science > Zoology
Department: Faculty of Science > Mathematics and Statistics
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Pure Administrator
    Date Deposited: 17 Oct 2011 10:03
    Last modified: 05 Sep 2014 07:37
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/29140

    Actions (login required)

    View Item