Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Journal quality grading: a critical appraisal

Lynch, P.A. and Blaxter, E. (2010) Journal quality grading: a critical appraisal. In: British Academy of Management, 2010-09-14 - 2010-09-16, Sheffield.

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

A critical examination is undertaken of United Kingdom journal ranking lists in business and management in relation to 'peripheral' industry-facing subjects using hospitality and tourism as an exemplar, with particular focus upon methodological and social construction processes. The paper adds to limited critical literature by contributing to recognising the power structures and contested nature of power underlying list creation. Lists contribute to discourse construction in the workplace and the wider academic community bringing many organisational and managerial benefits. However, a Bourdieuian analysis suggests they also reflect symbolic violence, bad faith, and raises questions of transparency, integrity and ethics, as well as generating criticisms in respect of their reliability and validity. Theoretical issues are debated and practical recommendations are made in order to raise the standards of list construction.

Item type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
ID code: 28732
Keywords: journal quality grading, critical, Bourdieu, power, higher education, Management. Industrial Management
Subjects: Social Sciences > Industries. Land use. Labor > Management. Industrial Management
Department: Strathclyde Business School > Strategy and Organisation
Professional Services > Information Services
Related URLs:
Depositing user: Ms Hilde Ann Quigley
Date Deposited: 12 Nov 2010 11:26
Last modified: 07 Dec 2013 13:22
URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/28732

Actions (login required)

View Item