Grieve, R.H. (2010) Pecuniary External Economies, Economies of Scale and Increasing Returns: A Note of Dissent. Review of Political Economy, 22 (1). pp. 127-140. ISSN 0953-8259
Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)Abstract
In a recent paper Chandra & Sandilands (2006) put forward three contentious propositions concerning the 'mechanics' of the process of economic growth: these propositions are to the effect (1) that 'pecuniary external economies' should not be considered instances of market failure; (2) that economies of scale are of little importance in accounting for increasing returns, increasing returns being, it is alleged, attributable to other factors such as external economies or 'industrial differentiation'; and (3) that increasing returns are not 'sector specific', implying that particular sectors should not therefore be singled out for special promotion. This note investigates the arguments advanced by Chandra & Sandilands in support of these propositions, and finds that no convincing case is made for any of them. In particular, we stress the invalidity of Chandra & Sandilands' contention that increasing returns are largely independent of economies of scale.
| Item type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ID code: | 28135 |
| Keywords: | Political science (General), Economic Theory |
| Subjects: | Political Science > Political science (General) Social Sciences > Economic Theory |
| Department: | Strathclyde Business School > Economics |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing user: | Miss Jenna Wright |
| Date Deposited: | 14 Oct 2010 09:51 |
| Last modified: | 12 Mar 2012 11:20 |
| URI: | http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/28135 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
