Picture of athlete cycling

Open Access research with a real impact on health...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by Strathclyde researchers, including by researchers from the Physical Activity for Health Group based within the School of Psychological Sciences & Health. Research here seeks to better understand how and why physical activity improves health, gain a better understanding of the amount, intensity, and type of physical activity needed for health benefits, and evaluate the effect of interventions to promote physical activity.

Explore open research content by Physical Activity for Health...

Methods against methods

Stierand, Marc and Dörfler, Viktor (2011) Methods against methods. In: Technology for Creativity and Innovation Tools, Techniques and Applications. IGI Global, Hershey, pp. 121-134. ISBN 1609605195

Full text not available in this repository. Request a copy from the Strathclyde author

Abstract

In this chapter we intend to clarify some issues about creativity and innovation methods, because we believe that the term is often misunderstood. For us neither creativity nor innovation is guided by a method. There are only methods against methods that can help the extraordinary individual to step faster and easier into a state of mind that is conducive to creativity, but which has no effect on whether the creative output becomes an innovation. In order to support this claim, we outline three major reasons that seem to be responsible for making people believe that such methods for creativity and innovation exist. Then we present our understanding of creativity and continue with a discussion on the systemic character of creativity and innovation. Finally we show that there are no methods for creativity, but methods against non-creativity by explaining in particular how one of these methods against non-creativity works. What we outline here is a necessarily one-sided and partial view. Our aim is not to convince the readers that we are right but to make them think by presenting one possible consistent approach.