Picture of a black hole

Strathclyde Open Access research that creates ripples...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde's Open Access research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including by Strathclyde physicists involved in observing gravitational waves and black hole mergers as part of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) - but also other internationally significant research from the Department of Physics. Discover why Strathclyde's physics research is making ripples...

Strathprints also exposes world leading research from the Faculties of Science, Engineering, Humanities & Social Sciences, and from the Strathclyde Business School.

Discover more...

Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data

Elliott, Robert and Fox, Christine and Beltyukova, Svetlana A. and Moskowitz, Andrew (2009) Filling in the missing pieces: a comparative Rasch analysis of inpatient and outpatient SCL90R data. In: SPR (UK) Ravenscar research Conference 2009, 2009-03-14 - 2009-03-16. (Unpublished)

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

In our Rasch analysis of the Symptom Checklist-90-R (SCL90R) using an American outpatient sample (n=298), Elliott et al. (2006) noted among other things that there was a sampling gap in the upper extreme range of the measured underlying client distress dimension. In this paper we remedy this gap by replicating our earlier results with a Scottish inpatient sample (n= 135). When analyzed separately, a three-point rating scale again appeared to provide a better trade-off between reliability and simplicity than the standard 5-point scale. The inpatient sample showed comparable person separation to the outpatient sample (5.13 vs. 5.31), but as expected because of greater participant homogeneity, item separation was substantially lower (4.76 vs. 8.89), indicating less discrimination among items, but equivalent discrimination among persons. Interestingly, when we collapsed the rating scale into only two points ('not at all' vs. all other ratings), there was very little loss of information. Ironically, this suggests that the SCL90R could be used as a 'checklist' after all, in which symptoms are rated either present or absent.