Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

On criticism of the nature of objectivity in classical continuum physics

Murdoch, A.I. (2005) On criticism of the nature of objectivity in classical continuum physics. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics, 17 (2). pp. 135-148. ISSN 14320959

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Murdoch (J. Elasticity 60, 233-242, 2000) showed that restrictions imposed upon response functions by material frame-indifference are the consequences of five distinct aspects of observer agreement (that is, of objectivity) and involve only proper orthogonal tensors. Accordingly it is unnecessary to invoke the principle of invariance under superposed rigid motions (in the sense of one observer, two motions), which imposes a restriction upon nature. Liu (Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 16, 177-183, 2003, and Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 17, 125-133, 2005) has challenged, misinterpreted and misrepresented the content of both Murdochs work and this work. Here all criticisms of Liu are answered, his counter-examples are used to amplify the tenets of Murdochs work, and a key modelling issue in the controversy is indicated. Further, the response function restrictions for a given observer, derived on the basis of considering other observers, are shown to be independent of possible differences in the scales of mass, length, and time employed by other observers.

Item type: Article
ID code: 2244
Keywords: material frame-indifference, objectivity, continuum physics, Physics, Physics and Astronomy(all), Mechanics of Materials, Materials Science(all)
Subjects: Science > Physics
Department: Faculty of Science > Mathematics and Statistics > Mathematics
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Strathprints Administrator
    Date Deposited: 06 Dec 2006
    Last modified: 04 Sep 2014 13:20
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/2244

    Actions (login required)

    View Item