Strathprints logo
Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

What 'rules' in sentencing? consistency and disparity in the absence of 'rules'

Tata, C. and Hutton, N. (1998) What 'rules' in sentencing? consistency and disparity in the absence of 'rules'. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 26 (3). pp. 339-364. ISSN 0194-6595

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

This paper considers critically the issue of consistency and disparity by examining sentencing in a jurisdiction, Scotland, which has few formal rules governing sentencing practice. First, it briefly outlines the main issues distinctive to the Scottish legal framework on sentencing and then propose reasons why interjudge sentencing disparity both might and might not be expected. It then proceeds to summarize the methodology and findings of a study, initiated by 10 individual sheriffs, to compare their custodial sentencing patterns. The implications of these findings for the roles of, nature of, and relationship between 'rules' and 'knowledge' in sentencing are discussed.

Item type: Article
ID code: 17989
Keywords: sentencing, Scotland, Scotland, Sociology and Political Science, Law
Subjects: Law > Law of the United Kingdom and Ireland > Scotland
Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Law > Law
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Strathprints Administrator
    Date Deposited: 29 Apr 2010 20:23
    Last modified: 26 Jul 2014 05:01
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/17989

    Actions (login required)

    View Item