Picture of two heads

Open Access research that challenges the mind...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. Strathprints provides access to thousands of Open Access research papers by University of Strathclyde researchers, including those from the School of Psychological Sciences & Health - but also papers by researchers based within the Faculties of Science, Engineering, Humanities & Social Sciences, and from the Strathclyde Business School.

Discover more...

Meta-analysis of clinical trials of Cyclo 3 Fort in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency

Boyle, P. and Diehm, C. and Robertson, C. (2003) Meta-analysis of clinical trials of Cyclo 3 Fort in the treatment of chronic venous insufficiency. International Angiology, 22 (3). pp. 250-262. ISSN 0392-9590

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Aim. Chron­ic ­venous insuf­fi­cien­cy (CVI) of the lower limbs is a major cause of mor­bid­ity and var­i­cose veins ­affect 20% to 60% of ­adults in the west­ern world. The treat­ment of ­patients with CVI ­attempts to ­reduce both clin­i­cal symp­toms and the devel­op­ment of chron­ic ­venous dis­ease. A meta-anal­y­sis using data from all clin­i­cal ­trials and stud­ies of Cyclo 3 Fort, a com­bi­na­tion of root ­extract of the Rus­cus acu­lea­tus plant (150 mg per cap­sule), hes­per­i­din meth­yl chal­cone (150 mg) and ascor­bic acid (100 mg), was car­ried out to esti­mate the over­all ­effect on the symp­toms and sever­ity of chron­ic ­venous insuf­fi­cien­cy. Meth­ods. The meta-anal­y­sis includ­ed 20 pla­ce­bo con­trolled, ran­dom­ised, dou­ble blind stud­ies and 5 ran­dom­ised stud­ies ­against a com­par­a­tor drug. There were 6 sin­gle arm stud­ies of Cyclo 3 Fort alone with no pla­ce­bo arm. In all stud­ies the ­response to Cyclo 3 Fort was com­pared to base­line val­ues. In total there was infor­ma­tion from 10246 sub­jects. ­Results. On a 4 point symp­tom sever­ity scale, where 0 cor­re­sponds to no symp­toms and 3 to ­severe symp­toms, Cyclo 3 Fort sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduc­es the sever­ity of pain by 0.44 (0.12) ­points; ­cramps 0.26 (0.08), heavi­ness 0.53 (0.11), and par­a­es­the­sia 0.29 (0.10) com­pared to pla­ce­bo. There is also a sig­nif­i­cant reduc­tion in ­venous capac­ity of 0.70 (0.19) ml/100 ml with Cyclo 3 Fort com­pared to pla­ce­bo. We also found reduc­tions in the sever­ity of oede­ma 0.43 (0.20) ­points, and decreas­es in calf and ankle cir­cum­fer­ence, 0.73 (0.37) cms and 1.17 (0.83) cm, respec­tive­ly, among ­patients treat­ed with Cyclo 3 Fort com­pared to pla­ce­bo which were not sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant. Con­clu­sion. ­Despite ques­tions sur­round­ing the var­i­abil­ity of data qual­ity and sam­ple size of some of the stud­ies, we con­clude that in ­patients with CVI Cyclo 3 Fort sig­nif­i­cant­ly reduc­es the sever­ity of the symp­toms com­pared to pla­ce­bo. This study is a ­strong and objec­tive dem­on­stra­tion of the clin­i­cal effi­ca­cy of Cyclo 3 Fort in treat­ing ­patients with CVI.