Picture of wind turbine against blue sky

Open Access research with a real impact...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs.

The Energy Systems Research Unit (ESRU) within Strathclyde's Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering is producing Open Access research that can help society deploy and optimise renewable energy systems, such as wind turbine technology.

Explore wind turbine research in Strathprints

Explore all of Strathclyde's Open Access research content

Resonance tropes in corporate philanthropy discourse

Spence, C. and Thomson, Ian (2009) Resonance tropes in corporate philanthropy discourse. Business Ethics: A European Review, 18 (4). pp. 372-388. ISSN 0962-8770

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

This paper explores corporate charitable giving disclosures in order to question the extent to which corporations can claim that their philanthropy activities are charitable at all. Exploration of these issues is carried out by means of a tropological analysis which focuses on the different linguistic tropes within the philanthropy disclosures of fifty-two companies, namely metaphor and synecdoche. The results reveal a number of complex and contradictory things. Primarily, the master-metaphor of 'altruism' projected by the corporate disclosures is ideologically at odds with the more business case oriented discourse that shapes the disclosures. This contradiction is put into starker contrast by the existence of a root-metaphor whereby the recipients of corporate philanthropy are presented as the 'deserving poor'. Synecdochal devices are present within the corporate disclosures whereby employee initiatives that are independent of corporate strategies are used to confer attributes onto the disclosures which bolster the master metaphor of 'altruism'. As such, corporate philanthropy is presented by the paper as a structurally incoherent discourse yet one that has implications for both extracting greater value from various societal groups and in defining, on behalf of civil society, what is a worthy cause.