Strathprints logo
Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Pandora's box and the delphic oracle : EU cohesion policy and state aid compliance

Wishlade, F.G. and Michie, R. (2009) Pandora's box and the delphic oracle : EU cohesion policy and state aid compliance. [Report]

[img] PDF - Submitted Version
Download (634Kb)

    Abstract

    The relationship between EU Competition policy and EU Cohesion policy is at best one of ambiguity and at worst one of direct conflict. While EU Cohesion policy explicitly intervenes to alter economic outcomes, EU Competition policy aims to ensure that State intervention does not interfere with the smooth functioning of the internal market or distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest. EU Competition policy predates EU Cohesion policy by several decades. EU Cohesion policy in its current form dates back to the end of the 1980s, which saw the radical restructuring and upgrading of a policy that had until then largely been an adjunct to national regional policies. By contrast, EU Competition policy was enshrined in the Treaty from the outset. It is clear that, back in the 1950s, the authors of the Treaty perceived the risks to the common market that lay in allowing Member States unfettered use of subsidies. Moreover, although the original provisions have been subject to extensive interpretation, the fundamental principle has remained unchanged since the outset: State aid which distorts or threatens to distort competition in the EU is prohibited, subject to certain exceptions. Given this context, EU-sponsored intervention in the form of the Structural Funds arguably sits uneasily with the precepts of State aid control, and there remain significant conceptual and practical difficulties in reconciling EU Cohesion and Competition policies, especially given that the Structural Funds Regulations impose specific requirements on the Member States which make State aid compliance issues of particular relevance to Structural Fund Managing Authorities. The aim of this article is to explore those issues and examine how they have been addressed in practice. It draws on a mix of desk research and interviews with staff working on the implementation of Structural Funds programmes and in State aid compliance. The article starts with an examination of definitional issues associated with State aid and briefly reviews the scope of admissible aid. It then covers the institutional and procedural arrangements for ensuring compliance with the State aid rules, and concludes by highlighting some key areas of difficulty where tensions remain unresolved.

    Item type: Report
    ID code: 15969
    Notes: Has also been submitted as an article to: Rivista giuridica del Mezzogiorno. (This is a variant record)
    Keywords: EU competition policy, state aid, regional aid, EU cohesion policy, structural funds, Social Sciences (General), Political institutions (Europe)
    Subjects: Social Sciences > Social Sciences (General)
    Political Science > Political institutions (Europe)
    Department: Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Government and Public Policy > European Policies Research Centre
    Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Prof John Bachtler
    Date Deposited: 09 Mar 2010 20:25
    Last modified: 06 Sep 2014 11:23
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/15969

    Actions (login required)

    View Item

    Fulltext Downloads: