Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Commercial surrogate motherhood and the alleged commodification of children: a defence of legally enforceable contracts

Swales, J. Kim and McLachlan, H.V. (2009) Commercial surrogate motherhood and the alleged commodification of children: a defence of legally enforceable contracts. Law and Contemporary Problems, 72 (3). pp. 91-107. ISSN 0023-9186

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Commercial surrogate-motherhood contracts should be legally enforceable, despite the vociferous and prevalent opposition to them. We shall, in particular, argue here that they do not involve the commodification of children, nor in other ways are they contrary to the interests of the children concerned. Our case is developed in response to criticisms of arguments we have made before in defense of commercial surrogate motherhood, particularly those criticisms made by Elizabeth Anderson, who is probably the most influential, eloquent, and forceful opponent of commercial surrogate motherhood or, as it is sometimes called, 'contract pregnancy.'

Item type: Article
ID code: 15585
Keywords: surrogacy, surrogate motherhood, commercial, legally enforceable contracts, England and Wales, Law (General), Law
Subjects: Law > Law of the United Kingdom and Ireland > England and Wales
Law > Law (General)
Department: Strathclyde Business School > Economics
Related URLs:
Depositing user: Mrs Kirsty Fontanella
Date Deposited: 18 Feb 2010 16:48
Last modified: 04 Sep 2014 23:28
URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/15585

Actions (login required)

View Item