Picture of a sphere with binary code

Making Strathclyde research discoverable to the world...

The Strathprints institutional repository is a digital archive of University of Strathclyde research outputs. It exposes Strathclyde's world leading Open Access research to many of the world's leading resource discovery tools, and from there onto the screens of researchers around the world.

Explore Strathclyde Open Access research content

Universal screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: interim results from the NHS Scotland pathfinder project

Reilly, J.S. and Stewart, S. and Christie, P. and Allardice, G. and Smith, A. and Masterton, R. and Gould, I.M. and Williams, C. and , Scottish Government Health Directorate (Funder) (2009) Universal screening for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: interim results from the NHS Scotland pathfinder project. Journal of Hospital Infection, 74 (1). pp. 35-41. ISSN 0195-6701

[img]
Preview
PDF (reilly_jhi_2010_74_35-41(1).pdf)
reilly_jhi_2010_74_35-41(1).pdf

Download (73kB) | Preview

Abstract

Following recommendations from a Health Technology Assessment (HTA), a prospective cohort study of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening of all admissions (N = 29 690) to six acute hospitals in three regions in Scotland indicated that 7.5% of patients were colonised on admission to hospital. Factors associated with colonisation included re-admission, specialty of admission (highest in nephrology, care of the elderly, dermatology and vascular surgery), increasing age, and the source of admission (care home or other hospital). Three percent of all those who were identified as colonised developed hospital-associated MRSA infection, compared with only 0.1% of those not colonised. Specialties with a high rate of colonisation on admission also had higher rates of MRSA infection. Very few patients refused screening (11 patients, 0.03%) or had treatment deferred (14 patients, 0.05%). Several organisational issues were identified, including difficulties in achieving complete uptake of screening (88%) or decolonisation (41%); the latter was largely due to short duration of stay and turnaround time for test results. Patientmovement resulted in a decision to decontaminate all positive patients rather than just those in high risk specialties as proposed by the HTA. Issues also included a lack of isolation facilities to manage patients with MRSA. The study raises significant concerns about the contribution of decolonisation to reducing risks in hospital due to short duration of stay, and reinforces the central role of infection control precautions. Further study is required before the HTA model can be re-run and conclusions redrawn on the cost and clinical effectiveness of universal MRSA screening.