Strathprints Home | Open Access | Browse | Search | User area | Copyright | Help | Library Home | SUPrimo

Assessment frameworks : a critical reflection

Crisp, Beth R. and Anderson, Mark R. and Orme, Joan and Green Lister, Pam (2007) Assessment frameworks : a critical reflection. British Journal of Social Work, 37 (6). pp. 1059-1077. ISSN 0045-3102

Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)

Abstract

Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice.

Item type: Article
ID code: 10758
Keywords: assessment frameworks, practice guidance, professional practice, social work assessment, Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Subjects: Social Sciences > Social pathology. Social and public welfare
Department: Faculty of Education > Glasgow School of Social Work
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (HaSS) > School of Social Work and Social Policy > Social Work
Related URLs:
    Depositing user: Strathprints Administrator
    Date Deposited: 16 Nov 2011 10:23
    Last modified: 06 Dec 2013 19:57
    URI: http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/10758

    Actions (login required)

    View Item