Bain, Stella and Baxter, James S. (2006) Patterns of malingering and compliance in measures of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 30 (3). pp. 453-461. ISSN 0191-8869
Full text not available in this repository. (Request a copy from the Strathclyde author)Abstract
This study aimed to compare indicators of malingering with those of compliance on the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scales (GSS 1). It was hypothesised that participants issued with instructions either to appear susceptible to leading questions or to comply with an interviewer's perceived requirements would show unique patterns of GSS scores, allowing them to be differentiated from each other, and from a control group. The study had a single-factor between participants design. Participants were tested in one of three conditions: Misled, Compliant, or Standard instructions. Sixty-six participants took part in the study. Results indicated unique patterns of scoring in all three conditions; all three groups were distinguishable from each other. Results support previous studies which indicate that some patterns of malingering may be identifiable on the GSS. However, compliant responding may not be readily distinguishable from genuine vulnerability. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical distinction between suggestibility and compliance.
| Item type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ID code: | 10174 |
| Keywords: | interrogative suggestibility, compliance, malingering, leading questions, interrogative pressure, interview, Psychology |
| Subjects: | Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > Psychology |
| Department: | Faculty of Humanities And Social Sciences > Psychology Professional Services > Centre for Lifelong Learning |
| Related URLs: | |
| Depositing user: | Strathprints Administrator |
| Date Deposited: | 17 May 2010 16:51 |
| Last modified: | 12 Mar 2012 10:53 |
| URI: | http://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/id/eprint/10174 |
Actions (login required)
| View Item |
